Precision Senior Marketing Logo

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Senior Market News from SeniorJournal.com

Gerber Life Medicare Supplement

Online Contracting

Medicare Supplement by Phone

Online CE Training

Foresters Final Expense

Assured Life Medicare Supplement

Senior Insurance Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Medicare Supplement Standards To Change in 2010

Submit to Digg digg it | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

The big news this week was the announcement of changes to Medicare supplement insurance standards by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The changes are detailed in the Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 78 / Friday, April 24, 2009 / Notices document. The following changes apply to Medigap plans with policy years beginning on or after June 1, 2010:

 

  • Issuers are prohibited from denying or conditioning the issuance or effectiveness of a policy, or discriminating in the pricing of the policy based on an individual's genetic information; also, issuers are prohibited from requesting or requiring an individual or family member of an individual to undergo a genetic test.

  • Added Hospice coverage as a Basic ‘‘Core’’ benefit to all plans, as similar coverage was added as a basic benefit in plans ‘‘K’’ and ‘‘L’’.

  • Deleted coverage for Preventive and At-Home Recovery. The NAIC concluded that Medicare Part B has changed to cover many more preventive benefits, and the usefulness of this benefit in a Medigap policy was significantly reduced, covering only part of an annual physical after Medicare covered the beneficiaries’ initial physical. The NAIC also concluded that the At-Home Recovery benefit was confusing and difficult to understand and administer, and changes to Medicare had made this benefit less meaningful.

  • Created a new plan D, which is identical to the current plan D except that the At-Home Recovery benefit was deleted.

  • Created a new plan G, which is identical to the current plan G except that the 80% Medicare Part B Excess charge benefit would be replaced by a 100% Medicare Part B Excess charge benefit, and the At-Home Recovery benefit was deleted.

  • Eliminated the current ‘‘E’’, ‘‘H’’, ‘‘I’’ and ‘‘J’’ plans as they duplicated existing Plans.

  • Created a new plan ‘‘M’’, which duplicates plan D but with a 50% coinsurance on the Part A deductible.

  • Created a new plan ‘‘N’’ which duplicates plan D with the Part B coinsurance being paid at 100%, less a $20 copay per physician visit and a co-pay of $50 per emergency room visit, unless the beneficiary was admitted to the hospital.

These changes have created two sets of standardized plans which are known as the "1990 standardized plans" for plans with an effective date of coverage prior to June 1, 2010, and "2010 standardized plans" for those after. For those of you who are compelled to know the many details of the changes, click here. In the near future, once everyone has had some time to digest this information, we will post a blog regarding the implications of these important changes.

Comments

Will current Plan J policy holders have to switch plans? Looks like the new plan N is taking direct aim at Medicare Advantage plans.
Posted @ Friday, May 01, 2009 4:44 PM by David Mansfield
This should be beneficial to both the client and the agent. The Plan "N" if reasonably priced, should be very popular.
Posted @ Friday, May 01, 2009 4:49 PM by <a href=http://lowcostmedigap.com>Medicare Supplement Insurance</a>
Hope there,s a prize for the first responder. We all know that change is in the air. We also know that the senior market is here to stay. Hoe the insurers cn cooperate with affordasble plans> I prwesently use a PFFS but dont expect to see them around after next year.
Posted @ Friday, May 01, 2009 4:51 PM by Tom Delaney
It's going to be crazy next year. With the possibility of the insurance companies being allowed to close their current risk pools and start over with new risk pools and, consequently, lower rates alot of clients on the older plans will experience some pretty big rate increases over time if they don't switch their plans.
Posted @ Friday, May 01, 2009 5:18 PM by Medicare Supplements
Preventive coverage should be increased, not decreased. It seems to me that if a person can prevent or take measures to prevent a more serious situation, it would save a lot of medical expenses. I sometimes wonder where 
 
common sense in all of this.
Posted @ Saturday, May 02, 2009 7:34 AM by Tom Newcomer
I should have known better than to expect stability. It seems that the Advantage Plan (the best for seniors is going away)I have this plan on myself and it works perfectly for me and about 905% of my clients.----JESSE PAINE
Posted @ Saturday, May 02, 2009 10:08 AM by Jesse Paine
Yeah Jesse, the Advantage Plan works only if the doctors in your aera accept it. I think it's a joke. I can't write it for my clients if I would not write it for my parents and I NEVER WOULD!!!
Posted @ Monday, May 04, 2009 1:15 PM by Bobby Collins
Bobby Collins, I am curious why you would not write an Advantage plan on your parents?
Posted @ Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:21 AM by Bob Beck
Change! That's all we heard in the last election. Well here it is and seniors are the worst for it. For those agents who desire to help people and not just sell policies, the Advantage plans are a God-send. I thought: "Wow, you mean I can now have a product for which anybody can qualify regardless of their health? Imagine how I can help those who are unable to afford a supplement, or those who have a supplement they no longer can afford but have disqualifying health issues, or vets who wanted coverage outside of the VA but a supplement costs too much." Then of course there's the freed-up premium dollars which could be redirected to help seniors afford other coverage for critical illness, cancer, and LTC. Depending on a person's point of view, I can understand how an agent would hate these plans if they were perceived as being a cancer to their existing book of medsup business. I guess it just boils down to a matter of priorities. Oh by the way, yea for the new Medsup plan changes. That's change I believe we all can live with.
Posted @ Friday, May 08, 2009 1:41 PM by W M Richard
I would bet 2:1 that Medicare Supplemental Insurance plans M and N are a bust. That is, about as popular as plan D.  
 
 
 
Consumers pay up for everyday for plans F or Plan J when they know its more than the Part B deductible benefit. They will have the same attitude towards M and N. 
 
 
 
To bad our government knows NOTHING about American desires. What would work is PLAN "O" (not for Obama) Here the design: Medigap pays 100% of the part B deductible, then balance bills the client for a $20 copay for office visits. Medigap "O" covers 50% of the Part "A" deductible. 
 
 
 
That's a value proposition American's would buy. Come on congress get a clue.
Posted @ Saturday, October 24, 2009 7:34 PM by 2010 Medicare Supplement Insurance Plans
I wonder if losing the At Home Recovery Benefit will be problematic for seniors.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:29 PM by Ohio Medicare Supplemental Insurance
These changes will be beneficial for seniors.I think the new plans M and N will work for seniors.It may save the medical expenses. We want to for that. 
 
Really a awesome article to read.. 
 
Thanks..
Posted @ Friday, February 26, 2010 4:26 AM by Ashley
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.